Discussion:
Twin Towers and 9-11 fraud: BUILDING 7 (NYC), also came down. Why wasn't this publicized?
(too old to reply)
Louis Epstein
2007-01-15 06:22:04 UTC
Permalink
A <***@hot.net> wrote:
:
: "danny burstein" <***@panix.com> wrote in message
: news:eoein1$er$***@reader2.panix.com...
:> In <***@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
:> ***@hotmail.com writes:
:> [ snip ]
:>
:> please don't waste the time, or our eyes, in replying
:> to the original poster. He or she is a troll
:
: I've been on this ng longer than you, so you must be the troll.

Whatever one's track record,
repeating the nutcase-conspiracy
line that 7 WTC was demolished
deliberately is trolling.

:> who has no interest whatsoever in the actual events
:> of that day,
:
: How about the time *leading up* to that day, smart-guy?
:
:>and merely wants to, so to speak, fan flames...
:
: Bet you never watched the video first before opening mouth.

Since it's more conspiracy-nut selective nonsense
demolished by the facts at http://www.911myths.com/
there's no reason to waste time on it.

-=-=-
The World Trade Center towers MUST rise again,
at least as tall as before...or terror has triumphed.
danny burstein
2007-01-15 06:38:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by Louis Epstein
Whatever one's track record,
repeating the nutcase-conspiracy
line that 7 WTC was demolished
deliberately is trolling.
I don't think he's smart enough to be a troll.

He's just a loon.
Post by Louis Epstein
: Bet you never watched the video first before opening mouth.
I actually did. I needed a laugh. It's so
off the wall that I felt like paging Humpty Dumpty.
--
_____________________________________________________
Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key
***@panix.com
[to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]
SlobbyDon
2007-01-15 07:16:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Louis Epstein
Post by Louis Epstein
Post by Louis Epstein
[ snip ]
please don't waste the time, or our eyes, in replying
to the original poster. He or she is a troll
I've been on this ng longer than you, so you must be the
troll.
Whatever one's track record,
repeating the nutcase-conspiracy
line that 7 WTC was demolished
deliberately is trolling.
Post by Louis Epstein
Post by Louis Epstein
who has no interest whatsoever in the actual events
of that day,
How about the time *leading up* to that day, smart-guy?
Post by Louis Epstein
and merely wants to, so to speak, fan flames...
Bet you never watched the video first before opening mouth.
Since it's more conspiracy-nut selective nonsense
demolished by the facts at http://www.911myths.com/
there's no reason to waste time on it.
Good site for debunking the conspiracy theories. I especially enjoyed the collapse analyses by scientific experts. This one indicates that the impact of the planes alone was sufficient to ultimately bring down the towers through assymetric stress loading:

http://www.911myths.com/WTCREPORT.pdf
J.D. Baldwin
2007-01-15 07:28:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by SlobbyDon
Post by Louis Epstein
Since it's more conspiracy-nut selective nonsense
demolished by the facts at http://www.911myths.com/
there's no reason to waste time on it.
Good site for debunking the conspiracy theories. I especially
enjoyed the collapse analyses by scientific experts. This one
indicates that the impact of the planes alone was sufficient to
Seconded. That site is excellent. I just wasted about two hours
flipping around there.
--
_+_ From the catapult of |If anyone disagrees with any statement I make, I
_|70|___:)=}- J.D. Baldwin |am quite prepared not only to retract it, but also
\ / ***@panix.com|to deny under oath that I ever made it. -T. Lehrer
***~~~~-----------------------------------------------------------------------
A
2007-01-15 08:16:15 UTC
Permalink
x-no-archive: yes
Post by J.D. Baldwin
Post by SlobbyDon
Post by Louis Epstein
Since it's more conspiracy-nut selective nonsense
demolished by the facts at http://www.911myths.com/
there's no reason to waste time on it.
Good site for debunking the conspiracy theories. I especially
enjoyed the collapse analyses by scientific experts. This one
indicates that the impact of the planes alone was sufficient to
Seconded. That site is excellent. I just wasted about two hours
flipping around there.
If you wasted your time there, obviously it didn't give you any
additional insight on 9-11, contradicting your previous sentence.
A
2007-01-15 08:14:34 UTC
Permalink
x-no-archive: yes
Post by Louis Epstein
Post by Louis Epstein
Post by Louis Epstein
[ snip ]
please don't waste the time, or our eyes, in replying
to the original poster. He or she is a troll
I've been on this ng longer than you, so you must be the
troll.
Whatever one's track record,
repeating the nutcase-conspiracy
line that 7 WTC was demolished
deliberately is trolling.
Post by Louis Epstein
Post by Louis Epstein
who has no interest whatsoever in the actual events
of that day,
How about the time *leading up* to that day, smart-guy?
Post by Louis Epstein
and merely wants to, so to speak, fan flames...
Bet you never watched the video first before opening mouth.
Since it's more conspiracy-nut selective nonsense
demolished by the facts at http://www.911myths.com/
there's no reason to waste time on it.
Are you reading the same web page I am on your web site
mentioned?
No facts demolished or refuted on any 'conspiracy' idea offered
by others.

"But does this make us an authority? No. If we’ve an overall
message here, it’s check things for yourself. Don’t trust a site just
because it’s telling you what you want to believe. Don’t believe us without
evaluating our arguments and checking the references we provide, either (we’re
as likely to make mistakes as anyone else). Look into the claims yourself,
discover both sides of the argument, and make your own mind up. The truth
deserves nothing less."
Post by Louis Epstein
Good site for debunking the conspiracy theories.
That is NOT what was said on their page cited:

"We’re not about debunking entire conspiracies, then, but will
use this site to zoom in on what we think are the more dubious stories,
revealing the misquotes, the distortions, the inaccuracies that are so
common online."
Post by Louis Epstein
I especially enjoyed the collapse analyses by scientific experts. This
one indicates that the impact of the > planes alone was sufficient to
That's a bunch of hooey nonsense amid pseudo-scientific words on
the effect of only 1 plane hitting high up on each Tower.


http://www.911myths.com/WTCREPORT.pdf
SlobbyDon
2007-01-15 15:44:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by A
x-no-archive: yes
...
Post by A
Post by SlobbyDon
I especially enjoyed the collapse analyses by scientific experts.
This one indicates that the impact of the planes alone was
sufficient to ultimately bring down the towers through assymetric
That's a bunch of hooey nonsense amid pseudo-scientific
words on the effect of only 1 plane hitting high up on each Tower.
http://www.911myths.com/WTCREPORT.pdf
Where is your refutation of the above article? If you don't understand the physics involved, how can you be sure that it didn't happen that way? From day one I never bought any of the conspiracy theories. Weakening just one floor was sufficient to bring either building down just the way they collapsed. Demolition experts could have accomplished it with far less firepower than the jets provided. What we saw were uncontrolled demolitions. In the end the result was the same, though getting there was not nearly as clean.
islanders
2007-01-15 18:00:48 UTC
Permalink
Roy is a paranoid schizophrenic.
PirateJohn
2007-01-15 18:47:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by islanders
Roy is a paranoid schizophrenic.
One personality is convinced that the other personality is out to get
it?

And which personality is the Loonitarian? That's the one that must die
... ;)


--PirateJohn--
www.PirateJohn.com
Louisiana Lou
2007-01-15 18:56:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by PirateJohn
Post by islanders
Roy is a paranoid schizophrenic.
One personality is convinced that the other personality is out to get
it?
And which personality is the Loonitarian? That's the one that must die
... ;)
The paranoids are out to get me.
islanders
2007-01-17 03:29:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by PirateJohn
.
One personality is convinced that the other personality is out to get
it?
Sadly, Roy's other personality is Ed Conrad.
The Kentucky Wizard
2007-01-17 08:48:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by islanders
Post by PirateJohn
.
One personality is convinced that the other personality is out to
get it?
Sadly, Roy's other personality is Ed Conrad.
OUCH!


Never argue with an idiot; they'll drag you down to their level and
beat you with experience.

© The Wiz ®
«€»¥«€»¥«€»
A
2007-01-17 14:47:54 UTC
Permalink
x-no-archive: yes
Post by islanders
Post by PirateJohn
.
One personality is convinced that the other personality is out to
get it?
Sadly, Roy's other personality is Ed Conrad.
Erik's other personality is Satan.
OUCH!
The Kentucky Wizard
2007-01-16 07:08:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by SlobbyDon
Post by A
x-no-archive: yes
...
Post by A
Post by SlobbyDon
I especially enjoyed the collapse analyses by scientific experts.
This one indicates that the impact of the planes alone was
sufficient to ultimately bring down the towers through assymetric
That's a bunch of hooey nonsense amid pseudo-scientific
words on the effect of only 1 plane hitting high up on each Tower.
http://www.911myths.com/WTCREPORT.pdf
Where is your refutation of the above article? If you don't
understand the physics involved, how can you be sure that it didn't
happen that way? From day one I never bought any of the conspiracy
theories. Weakening just one floor was sufficient to bring either
building down just the way they collapsed. Demolition experts could
have accomplished it with far less firepower than the jets provided.
What we saw were uncontrolled demolitions. In the end the result was
the same, though getting there was not nearly as clean.
Uh oh, I think you lost him right about here, SD. What you've said makes
perfect sense, and Roy simply can't reason with sound responses.


Never argue with an idiot; they'll drag you down to their level and
beat you with experience.

© The Wiz ®
«€»¥«€»¥«€»
Loading...